Connect with us

News

We Need Referendum, Freedom From Nigeria, Not Asylum, IPOB Tells UK Government

Published

on

Share for social good

The Indigenous People of Biafra says its victimised members do not want asylum from the British government.

IPOB said what it needs and appreciates most is a referendum that will accord a sovereign Biafran nation to its members.

The separatist group said this while reacting to the promise by the United Kingdom to grant asylum to IPOB members hounded by the Nigerian government.

FIRS

The Igbo National Council (INC) on Monday said the United Kingdom wanted to appease the Igbo people, over the wrongs done to them.

INC President, Chilos Godsent, said this in Owerri, Imo State, while reacting to the report that the United Kingdom was planning to grant asylum to alleged persecuted members of IPOB and Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra, MASSOB.

Godsent said, “The only thing is that the UK is trying to address some of the anomalies targeted on the Igbo nation. They want the Igbo to feel pacified and believe that the UK is in for social justice. The UK wants to redeem its image. In the history of Nigeria, the UK has not shown any support for the Igbo nation. They know that things have fallen apart in Nigeria.”

Reacting on Tuesday, IPOB in a statement through its media and publicity secretary, Emma Powerful appreciated the British government for its gesture but declined the offer.

“We the global family of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), ably led by our great and indomitable leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, has noted with satisfaction the news that the United Kingdom has agreed to grant asylum to persecuted Biafra agitators resident in the UK.

“While we commend them for this bold initiative, we wish to most graciously remind them that what we Biafrans need and cherish the most is a referendum and not asylum in the UK. We are tired of living in bondage in the devilish contraption called Nigeria they single-handedly created.

“We would not wish our children, now and generations unborn, to share the same geo-political space with those that reward terrorists and criminalise law-abiding citizens. We particularly thank the UK government for confirming what the rest of the civilized world already know that the great IPOB worldwide family are not terrorists but peaceful agitators and freedom fighters.

“That Nigeria is a country run by terrorists for the benefit of terrorists has been confirmed by this noble move by the United Kingdom. Aso Rock, the seat of power in Nigeria is a terrorist haven with serving ministers who are openly sympathetic to terrorists and their activities, coming and going as they please, while freedom fighters are languishing in jail.
“We want freedom, not asylum,” IPOB said.


Share for social good
CLICK TO GET A WhoGoHost Hosting PLAN
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

BREAKING: Court Sentences Nnamdi Kanu to Life Imprisonment

Published

on

Share for social good

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja has sentenced Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), to life imprisonment, marking a major climax to a decade-long trial.

The judgment, delivered on Thursday, comes four years after Kanu was arrested in Kenya under controversial circumstances and returned to Nigeria to face terrorism charges.

Kanu was convicted on all seven counts bordering on terrorism, despite pleading not guilty throughout the trial.

The judgment was delivered in his absence after he insisted that the court would not deliver judgment in the case. His refusal to participate prompted Justice Omotosho to order security operatives to remove him from the courtroom over what the judge described as “unruly behaviour.”

FIRS

In his ruling, Justice Omotosho held that several of Kanu’s broadcasts on Radio Biafra amounted to acts of terrorism, noting that his rhetoric was intentionally violent and targeted at destabilizing the country.

He added that Kanu’s sit-at-home directives in the South-East constituted terrorism, describing the order as a violation of citizens’ constitutional right to freedom of movement.

The court further stated that evidence before it showed Kanu had carried out “preparatory acts of terrorism” through broadcasts in which he allegedly ordered attacks on police and military personnel.

Justice Omotosho concluded that Kanu committed acts of terrorism against the Federal Republic of Nigeria, warranting the sentence imposed.


Share for social good
CLICK TO GET A WhoGoHost Hosting PLAN
Continue Reading

News

FG Seeks Death Penalty for Nnamdi Kanu After Terrorism Conviction

Published

on

Alleged Terrorism: Court set to deliver judgment on case against Nnamdi Kanu today
Share for social good

The Federal Government has urged the Federal High Court in Abuja to impose the death penalty on Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), following his conviction on seven counts of terrorism on Thursday.

Justice James Omotosho delivered the judgment after ruling that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, finding Kanu guilty on all seven charges.

Moments after the conviction, the Federal Government’s lead counsel, Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, asked the court to apply the maximum punishment prescribed under the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act, 2013.

FIRS

Awomolo told the court that several of the offences for which Kanu was found guilty carry a mandatory death sentence.

“My Lord, consequent upon the conviction, nothing further remains but the lawful imposition of sentence. The punishment prescribed for the offences in Counts One, Two, Four, Five and Six, pursuant to Section 12H of the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act 2013, is death,” Awomolo said.

“With all sense of humility, I say as a prosecutor that this court has no discretion in that regard. The only sentence Your Lordship can impose for Counts One, Two, Four, Five and Six is death, because the law empowers you to do so, and we expect that you will.”

Sentencing is expected to follow after the court considers all submissions from both sides.

WATCH THE PROSECUTOR SPEAK


Share for social good
CLICK TO GET A WhoGoHost Hosting PLAN
Continue Reading

Biafra

BREAKING: Nnamdi Kanu Convicted on Terrorism Charges by Federal High Court

Published

on

Nnamdi Kanu Refuses to Enter Defence, Says “No Case” Exists Against Him
Share for social good

Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has been convicted on terrorism charges filed against him by the Nigerian government. The verdict was delivered on Tuesday by a Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice James Omotosho.

Kanu, who had previously resisted the court proceedings and refused to participate in his defence, was found guilty on all counts. According to Justice Omotosho, the court had no choice but to rely on the evidence presented by the prosecution after Kanu declined to engage in his defence.

“As an Apostle of Jesus Christ, I begged Kanu passionately to enter his defence, but he obstinately refused,” Justice Omotosho said.

Key Convictions

  • Terrorism through broadcasts: Kanu was found guilty of inciting violence through broadcasts linked to IPOB activities.
  • International terrorism: The court ruled that Kanu qualifies as an international terrorist.
  • Sit-at-home orders in South-East Nigeria: He was convicted for enforcing sit-at-home directives that disrupted businesses and daily life across the South-East states.
  • Murder of Ahmed Gulak: The court linked Kanu and members of the Eastern Security Network (ESN) to the murder of the former politician in Imo State.
  • Leadership of a proscribed organisation: Kanu was also convicted for leading IPOB, which is officially listed as a terrorist organisation in Nigeria.

Justice Omotosho emphasized that Kanu’s refusal to enter a defence left the court with no alternative but to act on the incontrovertible evidence presented by the prosecution.

The court’s ruling marks a major development in Nigeria’s ongoing fight against terrorism and separatist agitation in the South-East.

FIRS

More updates to follow…


Share for social good
CLICK TO GET A WhoGoHost Hosting PLAN
Continue Reading

News

Alleged Genocide: ‘Trump Is Serious, Not Making Empty Threats’ – Riley Moore Warns Nigerian Delegation

Published

on

Riley M. Moore
Share for social good

A high-powered Nigerian government delegation led by National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu met with U.S. lawmakers on Wednesday amid escalating allegations of Christian persecution and genocide in Nigeria.

The visit comes after former U.S. President Donald Trump redesignated Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern and ordered an investigation into claims that Christians are being targeted. The move followed comments by Nigeria’s Vice-President, Kashim Shettima, who recently backed a two-state solution to the Israel–Gaza conflict, triggering intensified scrutiny from U.S. political and religious groups.

Trump tasked several lawmakers, including Congressman Riley Moore, to lead the inquiry. Despite repeated attempts by the Nigerian government to counter what it describes as a false narrative, U.S. officials have continued to act on growing claims that Christian communities face systemic persecution.

Tensions escalated further on Tuesday when American rapper Nicki Minaj was invited to the United Nations to testify against Nigeria in a session organised with the backing of the U.S. Mission to the UN. Nigerian officials were barred from attending the hearing, prompting a strong protest.

FIRS

Nigeria’s Chargé d’Affaires to the UN, Syndoph Endoni, condemned the move, likening it to “shaving our head in our absence.”

Ribadu Meets U.S. Congressmen

On Wednesday, Ribadu and senior government officials met Congressman Moore in Washington, D.C., to present Nigeria’s position and address concerns surrounding insecurity and religious violence.

The delegation included Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Bianca Ojukwu, Inspector General of Police Kayode Egbetokun, Attorney-General Lateef Fagbemi, Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Olufemi Oluyede, Chief of Defence Intelligence Lt. Gen. E.A.P. Undiendeye, among other top security officials.

Moore confirmed the meeting on social media, describing the engagement as “open and constructive.” He said discussions focused on terrorism, security cooperation, and the protection of vulnerable communities across Nigeria.

“Today, I had a frank, honest, and productive discussion with senior members of the Nigerian government regarding the horrific violence and persecution Christians face and the ongoing threat terrorism poses across Nigeria,” Moore said.

He added that he had insisted the U.S. expects “tangible steps to ensure that Christians are not subject to violence, persecution, displacement, and death simply for believing in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.”

Moore said the United States is willing to deepen collaboration with Nigeria to combat Boko Haram, ISWAP, and violent extremist groups, especially in the Northeast and Middle Belt.

He issued a strong warning, emphasising that both Congress and Trump are aligned on holding Nigeria accountable:

“President Trump and Congress are united and serious in our resolve to end the violence against Christians and disrupt and destroy terrorist groups within Nigeria.”

As of Wednesday night, the Nigerian delegation had not released any public statement regarding the engagement.

Follow BONA NAIJA for more


Share for social good
CLICK TO GET A WhoGoHost Hosting PLAN
Continue Reading

Biafra

Judge Orders Nnamdi Kanu Out of Courtroom as Judgment Begins

Published

on

Alleged Terrorism: Court set to deliver judgment on case against Nnamdi Kanu today
Share for social good

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday ordered security operatives to forcibly remove detained IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu, from the courtroom after the proceedings were repeatedly disrupted.

The dramatic scene unfolded moments after Kanu insisted that the court could not proceed with delivering judgment in the terrorism charges filed against him by the Federal Government.

Kanu, who raised his voice several times, demanded that the judge show him the section of the law that barred him from submitting a final written address. His outbursts halted the proceedings, prompting Justice Omotosho to stand down the matter while security agents escorted him out.

FIRS

Before the disruption, Justice Omotosho had dismissed fresh applications filed by Kanu despite the case already being scheduled for judgment. According to the judge, the motions merely rehashed arguments previously raised and resolved in earlier rulings.

The court also rejected Kanu’s request to refer the matter to the Court of Appeal, citing Section 306 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015, which prohibits the stay of proceedings in criminal trials.

Additionally, Kanu’s bid for bail was turned down. Justice Omotosho, however, noted that some of the issues raised by the IPOB leader would be addressed during the final judgment.

The court has now commenced reading the judgment in the high-profile case.


Share for social good
CLICK TO GET A WhoGoHost Hosting PLAN
Continue Reading
Advertisement

CONNECT ON FACEBOOK

Trending